(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
(LOS ANGELES) – The U.S. Supreme Court today required the Trump administration to go back and provide an adequate public justification for adding a citizenship question to Census 2020. The ruling calls into serious doubt whether the citizenship question can remain, especially because a meritorious claim of unconstitutional racial intent moves forward in MALDEF’s challenge […]
